102.3 Max FM

Dapper Music Responds to Allegations

Written by on December 12, 2024

Dapper Music Responds to Shallipopi’s Allegations of Breach of Trust and Financial Transparency

Dapper Music has officially reacted to the claims made by Nigerian artist Shallipopi regarding his split from the company, which has made headlines since December 11, 2024. The rapper, whose real name is Crowbn Uzama, took to Instagram to announce his departure from Dapper Music, citing accusations of a breach of trust and financial transparency.

In his public statement, Shallipopi explained that his decision to part ways with the label stemmed from a publishing deal he was pressured to sign with Dvpper Digital, a subsidiary of Dapper Music founded by Damilola Akinwunnmi (also known as Dapper). The artist further alleged that Dapper Music failed to provide full transparency regarding his financial dealings and made him sign away 30% of his earnings indefinitely.

Dapper Music Denies Allegations, Calls Them Unfounded

In response to Shallipopi’s allegations, Dapper Music swiftly issued a statement rejecting the claims as “shocking and unfounded.” The label emphasized that all contracts presented to its artists are handled with complete transparency and clarity. Dapper Music assured the public that the artists are provided with full legal representation to safeguard their interests throughout the process.

Dapper Music Responds to Shallipopi's Allegations of Breach of Trust and Financial Transparency

Dapper Music Responds to Shallipopi’s Allegations of Breach of Trust and Financial Transparency

Addressing the specific issue of financial transparency, Dapper Music stated that they have fully cooperated with Shallipopi and his auditors, even going as far as organizing a meeting on December 9, 2024, to discuss his request for a detailed financial statement. The label also clarified that there has been no breach in terms of financial dealings.

Clarification on 30% Management Fee

One of Shallipopi’s most prominent allegations was that Dapper Music forced him to sign away 30% of his earnings in perpetuity. Dapper Music was quick to clarify that no such clause exists in the artist’s contract. Instead, the 30% fee in question relates to the standard management cost agreed upon by both parties—a figure that aligns with global industry standards.

Dapper Music Stands by Its Commitment to Artists

Dapper Music reiterated that it conducts its business with the utmost sincerity and professionalism, always prioritizing transparency and fairness in its dealings with artists. The label expressed confidence in its practices and stated that it is fully prepared to seek legal recourse in a court of law to address these false claims.

Finally, Dapper Music referred to the allegations as a “pre-mediated attack” sponsored by “envy-driven proxies” who seek to undermine the label’s success and reputation in the industry.

Stay tuned for more updates as the situation develops.


Current track

Title

Artist

Background