Bloody Civilian Responds to N200B Lawsuit with Humor
Written by MAX FM on November 26, 2024
Nigerian singer and activist Bloody Civilian has responded to a N200 billion lawsuit filed by preacher Lady Apostle Helen Ukpabio and her daughter, Imaobong Elijah Ukpabio. In a series of tweets, Bloody Civilian expressed shock and humour. She joked about stepping up her hustle to meet the large compensation amount.
“Guys, they just sued me for 200 billion naira. This December, I’m adding: Yoruba weddings, naming ceremonies, comedy, hosting, birthday parties (no Gen Z) & more!” She humorously listed the new services she would offer.
The lawsuit accuses Bloody Civilian of defaming Ukpabio on X (formerly Twitter).
The lawsuit claims Bloody Civilian’s tweets accused Ukpabio of promoting harmful practices, referencing past allegations and an alleged UK travel ban. Ukpabio’s lawyers have called the posts “reckless, satanic, and libellous,” arguing they tarnished Ukpabio’s reputation and caused significant distress. The lawsuit demands a public apology and N200 billion in compensation for reputational damage.
Helen Ukpabio, the founder of Liberty Gospel Church, is a polarizing figure. Helen Ukpabio has sparked significant controversy due to her teachings on witchcraft and alleged involvement in harmful practices. Furthermore, critics accuse her of stigmatizing children and promoting dangerous beliefs. Meanwhile, her supporters view her as a defender of Christian values. In contrast, others argue that her methods are counterproductive and cause more harm than good. Nevertheless, Ukpabio remains a prominent figure in the debate surrounding witchcraft and child rights. Critics accuse her of stigmatizing children and promoting dangerous beliefs. Supporters see her as a defender of Christian values.
The lawsuit has sparked a heated debate on social media. Some users, on the one hand, defend Bloody Civilian’s right to free speech, arguing that she should be allowed to express her views. On the other hand, others strongly condemn her comments, labelling them as libellous and harmful. As a result, this has led to a heated debate, with opinions split on the matter.
The public’s reaction continues to divide opinions on the matter.